Cook: 'The purpose of Prop 2 is to restore--not extend union power.'
Critics of Proposal 2 to protect collective bargaining and middle class families may have lost their court challenges to keep the issue off the November ballot, but they haven't given up the fight. They're flooding the media with interviews and ads designed to scare people into voting NO on Proposal 2 with questionable and inflammatory information.
In their latest attempt to discredit Proposal 2, critics claim that passage of the amendment would mean school employees could strike and not face any fines if they did.
MEA President Cook dismisses the idea, "Proposal 2 has within it for the first time a constitutional prohibition on school employee strikes. The right of the Legislature to determine penalties for school employee strikes is untouched by Proposal 2."
Opponents have also falsely said that Proposal 2 would undo laws such as those requiring school bus drivers to receive safety training, protecting students from sexual predators, and requiring school districts to fire employees with criminal backgrounds.
It's obvious that the opposition will resort to lies and fake scenarios to undermine the real purpose of Proposal 2--to restore the collective bargaining rights the Legislature stole from us in a power grab designed to destroy unions and the middle class. Proposal 2 would give us the opportunity to bargain and have a voice in issues such as evaluation, seniority, the cost of insurance and layoff and recall.